Salmon News

Salmon are getting cooked by climate change. Here’s how they could be saved

Emily Chung · CBC News · Jul 23, 2021

Both Pacific and Atlantic salmon at risk from climate change impacts, but habitat tweaks could help.

 CBC News · by Emily Chung Jul 23, 2021

A dead chinook salmon floats in a fish trap on the lower Klamath River in Weitchpec, Calif., in June. A historic drought and low water levels on the Klamath River are threatening the existence of fish species along the 413-kilometre long river. But heat and drought also threaten salmon on both of Canada’s coasts. (Nathan Howard/The Associated Press)

A heat wave is expected to kill all juvenile chinook salmon in California’s Sacramento River, wildlife officials say. Meanwhile, climate change and extreme heat waves are hitting Canada’s salmon too, on both coasts.

So, how bad is it here, and what can be done to save our salmon? CBC News explains.

What’s happening to salmon in California?

California’s Department of Fish and Wildlife warned last week that among chinook salmon in the Sacramento River “it is possible that all in-river juveniles will not survive this season.” That was due to a heat wave that pushed local temperatures above 37 C, combined with a drought that caused more water to be diverted to cities and farmers, making the river shallower and quick to heat up.

Has that kind of thing happened further north?

There are some reports of it happening amid this year’s record-breaking heat wave in B.C. The B.C. Wildlife Federation reports that the Okanagan River was more than 23 C this week, causing sockeye salmon to halt their migration.

“There’s a good chance the run will be … doomed by heat,” said Jesse Zeman, director of the federation’s fish and wildlife restoration program.

In 2016, warm temperatures were blamed for the lowest number of returning sockeye in B.C.’s Fraser River on record, and two years later, officials warned that the river was so warm that migrating sockeye salmon might die on their journey. In 2019, there were heat-related salmon die-offs blamed  in Alaska and at a fish farm in Newfoundland.

WATCH | Team surveys dead salmon on Alaska river:

Team surveys dead salmon on Alaska River

2 years ago A team from the Yukon River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission in Alaska surveys dead chum salmon on the Koyukuk River in July. 

But salmon deaths due to heat aren’t necessarily sudden and noticeable. Many populations of both Pacific and Atlantic salmon have been in gradual decline for decades, and scientists say warmer temperatures and other aspects of climate change have played a role.

  • Atlantic salmon in eastern Cape Breton could be added to list of species at risk
  • New research suggests 70% decline in diversity of B.C. sockeye salmon stock in past century

How do warm temperatures harm or kill salmon?

Both Atlantic and Pacific salmon are cold-water fish, which means they tend to do best at temperatures in the mid-teens and struggle when it’s over 20 C.

Warm water can harm salmon in several ways. For one thing, warmer water holds less oxygen, making it harder for fish to breathe. Because they’re cold-blooded, they can’t adjust their body temperature relative to the environment when conditions get too warm or too cold. Warmer temperatures speed up their metabolism, causing them to require more oxygen and food, and also forcing them to swim to find cooler waters, consuming more energy.

The heat makes it harder for them to swim and can stress salmon migrating to their spawning grounds, said Sue Grant, head of the state of salmon program at Fisheries and Oceans Canada. As a result, some don’t survive to spawn, and those that do may produce less healthy offspring.

Are other impacts hurting salmon?

Yes. Besides extreme heat, climate change is causing drier conditions. Shrinking glaciers, smaller winter snowpacks and an earlier spring melt reduce the amount and depth of water in rivers, causing them to heat up more quickly, said Aaron Hill, executive director of the Watershed Watch Salmon Society.

“By the late summer, rivers are running low and becoming lethally hot for salmon,” he said.

WATCH | Glacier melt in B.C. at shocking levels:

Glacier melt in B.C. at ‘shocking’ levels

6 years ago Hot summer a ‘sad window’ into future without glaciers, reports Chris Brown 

During droughts, humans also divert more water to cities and farmers, leaving less in the rivers — one of the big problems in California’s Sacramento River, but also in water-stressed parts of B.C., such as the Interior and the east coast of Vancouver Island.

People are also taking too much groundwater that would otherwise cool streams as it seeps into them gradually, Hill said.

Deforestation from wildfires, pests such as mountain pine beetle and clearcut logging have increased erosion and landslides that can damage spawning grounds or block salmon migration to those spawning grounds.  

“It’s just this compounding, interacting set of impacts, both natural and human caused,” Hill said.

But it’s not just in rivers that salmon face challenges, as they spend much of their life at sea. There, they also face marine heat waves, such as the one dubbed “the blob,” which raised temperatures along the Pacific coast by 3 to 5 C from 2013 until now, said Grant. That has altered the food web, replacing the large, fatty northern zooplankton that salmon normally eat with less nutritious zooplankton from the south.

“Animals that are feeding on these poor-quality animals at the base of the food web will grow more slowly,” Grant said. “They’ll be more vulnerable to predation.”

WATCH | How a new ‘blob’ is set to impact marine life off B.C.’s coast:

A new “blob” is brewing, and it’s set to seriously impact marine life off B.C.’s coast

2 years ago A new marine heat wave spreading across a portion of the Pacific Ocean off the coast of British Columbia has so far grown into one of the largest of its kind in the last four decades, officials say, second only to the infamous “blob” that disrupted marine life five years ago. 

Atlantic salmon face similar impacts in the northwest Atlantic, where fish from all populations from both North America and Europe grow into adults.

“That’s having a big impact on sea survival,” Crabbe said, noting that fewer adults have been returning to Canada to spawn since the early 1990s.  

Are all salmon vulnerable?

Some are more vulnerable than others. On the Pacific coast, chinook are doing particularly poorly, declining in numbers, size and reproductive rate throughout their range, from California to Alaska, said Grant, lead author of a 2019 report on how Pacific salmon are doing.

Pink and chum, species that spend less time in freshwater, where temperature changes are more extreme, were doing better than chinook, coho and sockeye. Grant said pink and chum did see some decline in 2019 and 2020, after the report was published. 

Spawning sockeye salmon, a species of Pacific salmon, are seen making their way up the Adams River. Chinook, coho and sockeye, which spend more time in freshwater, are seeing bigger declines thank pink and chum, which spend more of their lives at sea. (Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press)

With Atlantic salmon, the young are particularly vulnerable, said Emily Corey, a PhD candidate at the University of New Brunswick, has been studying the effects of heat stress on juvenile Atlantic salmon.

She points to three main reasons why the young are more at risk:

  • They spend the first three to five years of their lives in freshwater, where temperatures can get more extreme.
  • They don’t swim very well.
  • They tend to be territorial, so they don’t like to move to a new location unless they have to.

That said, her research has found that some can move up to several kilometres to find cold water if necessary.

What is being done to reduce impact of extreme heat on salmon?

In June, the federal government announced the $647.1 million Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative. It includes several kinds of solutions. Many are also targeted at Atlantic salmon under other programs:

Conservation and stewardship

This involves habitat monitoring and restoration, some of the goals of the Watershed Watch Salmon Society and the Atlantic Salmon Federation and its partners. 

In Nova Scotia, the Margaree Salmon Association has installed water temperature monitors in the Margaree and Mabout rivers to help find hot spots. When they’re found, work crews will do things such as plant trees to shade the river at those locations.

In New Brunswick, the Miramichi Salmon Association has been enhancing pools of cold water along the river by diverting the river’s flow to carve them out and make them bigger. 

The Donnelly Brook cold water enhancement project was completed by the Miramichi Salmon Association in 2014. It’s designed to direct the flow of water to enlarge cold water pools within the waterway where salmon can shelter from extreme heat. (Nathan Wilbur/Atlantic Salmon Federation)

On both coasts, conservationists say better land use planning and targeting salmon habitat for protection and reforestation will have a big impact. In New Brunswick, the ASF is working with the provincial government to protect the most-critical cold water springs and brooks feeding into important salmon rivers such as the Miramichi.

In B.C., Hill says there are huge swaths of great potential salmon habitat throughout the Fraser River watershed that have been blocked by structures such as culverts and road crossings. It’s possible to replace those with alternatives that will allow salmon to use that habitat.

Meanwhile, in drier areas, Hill says better water planning is needed, along with licensing and regulating groundwater use, which hasn’t yet been implemented by the provincial government.

  • Some B.C. restaurants remove wild salmon from menu in response to declining stocks
  • Drought danger grows as some parts of B.C. see no rain for almost 5 weeks

Changes, closures to fisheries and harvest

This is one happening on both coasts. In late June, the federal government closed 60 per cent of commercial salmon fisheries in B.C. and Yukon to conserve stocks. Most recreational fisheries for Fraser chinook have also faced widespread closures since 2019

Many Atlantic salmon commercial fisheries have also closed. In 2018, the Atlantic Salmon Federation struck a 12-year deal with partners in Iceland and Greenland to ban commercial fishing on the west coast of Greenland and in the Faroe Islands. Already, more salmon seem to be returning to Canada, Crabbe said.

WATCH | Atlantic salmon returned from the ocean in greater numbers last year:

Atlantic salmon returned from the ocean in greater numbers last year

2 months ago Biologists find glimmer of hope in year of higher Atlantic salmon numbers. 

Important cold water pools in the Miramichi River system in N.B. are typically closed to recreational fishing when the water temperature exceeds 20 C, Crabbe added. In 2018, there were almost 60 days like that.

Stocking programs. Enhanced hatchery production is one of the solutions in the federal Pacific salmon strategy. In California, officials aim to save some Sacramento River chinook by trucking them to a hatchery. Hill said there are some desperate situations that call for that kind of response. But in general, it’s controversial, as there’s evidence hatchery-raised salmon are less fit to survive than their wild counterparts.

  • Thousands of salmon fry released in B.C. river to restore populations devastated by Big Bar landslide
  • Captive rearing can accidentally change animals so they may not survive in the wild

Could salmon go extinct due to climate change?

“No one’s worried that they’re all going to disappear,” Grant said.

They do seem to be adapting to climate change to some extent. Both Atlantic and Pacific salmon are being found further north, and some northern populations are doing well. But some populations could disappear, especially in the south, and the loss will be felt by communities with deep and strong connections to salmon, both Crabbe and Grant say.

“They’re really critical, critically important to the indigenous people of Western Canada for food, social, ceremonial reasons, and also really play a big role in fisheries,” Grant said. “They’re embedded in the culture … probably to all Canadians.”

Please see full article here . . . . .

New way to report possible fishing violations to DFO

Ladysmith Chronicle – Sep. 16, 2019

DFO Pacific’s Conservation and Protection branch has a new email to receive report and photos.

There’s a new way for eyewitnesses to report suspected fishing violations to DFO fishery officers.

Conservation and Protection, DFO’s enforcement arm, has set up a new direct email address for members of the public to send in reports, photos, and videos.

“DFO Pacific Region has just added a new enforcement tool for members of the public to report suspicious fishing activity and suspected violations,” according to the news release.

The new email is: DFO.ORR-ONS.MPO@dfo-mpo.gc.ca

The email goes directly to fishery officers through the Observe, Record, Report (ORR) system which already features a toll-free hotline for calls.

But this will add the option of sending digital files.

Pacific Streamkeepers Federation had this to say on social media about the idea: “We’ve been asking for this and now (drum roll please) it has happened.”

Biologist Mike Pearson of Pearson Ecological also welcomes the move.

“This is great to see, if long overdue,” Pearson stated about the new DFO email.

It means people can email what’s going on in the field.

“This is an important addition to the existing hotline in that it enables people to send in photos of violations and to retain a permanent record of the report in the form of a sent email,” Pearson said.

“The Province should set up something similar with their RAPP line.”

As part of the work done by DFO fishery officers to end illegal activity, members of public are asked to send detailed information about possible violations any contravention of the Fisheries Act and regulations.

Witnesses can also call the toll-free line, Observe, Record, Report (ORR) at 1-800-465-4336 to make a report by phone.

See full article here . . . . .

DFO shuts most B.C. fisheries in desperate effort to save salmon

June 29, 2021 – National Observer by Marc Fawcett-Atkinson 

Commercial salmon fishing will be closed in most of coastal B.C. this year and into the foreseeable future to save the West Coast’s critically low fish stocks, the federal government announced Tuesday.

Nearly 60 per cent of the province’s commercial salmon fisheries, once the economic and cultural backbone of the B.C. coast, will be forced to shutter in 2021, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) said. Yukon salmon rivers will also be closed to all commercial fishing in 2021, while recreational fisheries in both Yukon and B.C. will be restricted. Many of B.C.’s coastal fisheries will likely not reopen to commercial harvesting for years in an attempt to revive the province’s dwindling salmon populations.

“No fisheries minister wants to make these kinds of decisions, because they’re very difficult and impact people’s livelihoods,” said federal Fisheries Minister Bernadette Jordan. “(But) no fisheries minister wants to be the minister when the stock collapses, and that’s where we are right now with Pacific salmon — it’s a stock on the verge of collapse. If we don’t do everything we can, we won’t have salmon.”

Pacific salmon are in a long-term decline, with many runs verging on collapse as they struggle to survive climate change, habitat destruction and overfishing. Last year saw the lowest global salmon catch since 1982, according to the North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission, an international organization protecting wild salmon and other fish.

The province’s salmon harvesters — many of them independent and nearing retirement — are also struggling after years of dangerously low catches, according to a report published by the United Fish and Allied Workers Union this spring.

To compensate harvesters for the loss, DFO is creating a program to buy back commercial fishing licences from fish harvesters in an effort to permanently decrease the size of the West Coast salmon fleet. In 2019, DFO issued 1,582 commercial fishing licences for West Coast salmon, according to Statistics Canada.

Under the program, fish harvesters will be able to sell their licences back to the government at market value. Financially depleted after years of bad harvests, these licence buybacks will be many harvesters’ main retirement income, noted Tasha Sutcliffe, senior adviser for community fisheries at Ecotrust Canada.

First Nations communities that hold one of 127 communal commercial licences will be able to shift to fishing techniques less-damaging to salmon or use the licences to catch other healthy commercial species, like halibut.

“Some First Nations do harvest commercially, but they’re coming to the realization that something needs to be done to preserve our stocks,” said Chief Dalton Silver, fisheries representative for the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs. Salmon are key to food security and cultural well-being for many Indigenous people in the province. Preserving them is essential, even if it impacts First Nations’ commercial fisheries, he said.

“I think a lot of our people would feel better if there was a complete halt to the commercial aspect of the fishery (to) allow the stocks to rebuild,” he said, noting that while not all Indigenous people agree entirely with that position, it is becoming more commonplace.

“It’s incredibly sad,” said Aaron Hill, executive director of Watershed Watch, an organization working to bring back B.C.’s salmon. “When we see a fishery closure, it’s a collective failure of all of us to manage our salmon and fisheries better over the last decades (to) avoid such drastic measures and their social and economic consequences.”

Commercial salmon fishing will be closed in most of coastal B.C., the federal government announced Tuesday. #Salmon #BC

It is essential the licence buyback program adequately supports fish harvesters who have seen their livelihoods disappear, said Hill. Overfishing is only one of the factors driving the species’ decline, with climate change, open-pen fish farms and habitat destruction also to blame.

“The salmon crisis is not the fault of working fishermen,” he explained.

Looking ahead, he hopes this decision will make a profound shift in how salmon is managed and harvested in B.C. That means moving to fishing techniques that increase the market value of each fish while reducing the overall environmental impact of commercial fishing.

For example, fishing by troll — a technique that relies on hooks and line — or harvesting fish once they reach their spawning river can send higher-quality fish to market with less ecological impact. Techniques that help harvesters only retain fish from the healthiest runs, like genetic testing, could also help make any future fisheries more sustainable, he said.

Silver added that fisheries management also needs to be overhauled to better integrate Indigenous knowledge.

“I’ve always said that if (Indigenous people) were involved from the very beginning, upon contact, with the management of our resources, we’d all be in a lot better place today,” he said. It’s an approach that has gained significant attention recently thanks to several researchers and its adoption by global seafood ranking organization Ocean Wise this spring.

DFO has committed to working with First Nations to revive the salmon, said Jordan, Canada’s fisheries minister. The ministry will also work with fish harvesters, environmental groups and other organizations to bring the fish back.

“There’s no one thing that’s going to solve the problem, but if we don’t start taking these measures now, there’s going to be no salmon to protect,” she said. “I think we have a moment in time, and that window is closing. I think if we don’t do this now, it will be too late — but I still think we have the ability to make a difference.”

See article here . . . . .

Ottawa to close about 60 per cent of commercial salmon fisheries to conserve stocks

Jun 29, 2021  – The Canadian Press

VANCOUVER — The federal government says it will close several commercial Pacific salmon fisheries in British Columbia and Yukon beginning this season to conserve fish stocks that are on the “verge of collapse.” 

The Fisheries Department said in a news release Tuesday that 79 of 138 commercial and First Nations communal fisheries will be affected, which amounts to about 60 per cent.

Fisheries Minister Bernadette Jordan said these closures will reduce immediate pressure on fragile stocks that have drastically declined.

“We’re seeing a decline in the stock runs, in some cases up to 90 per cent,” she said in an interview.

“And, you know, we need to do everything we can to conserve the species.”

The government’s announcement follows plans for the distribution of nearly $650 million earmarked for the Pacific Salmon Strategy Initiative. The plan will guide work on conservation, better hatchery production, an overhaul of fish harvesting methods and improve the collaboration of fisheries management. 

The closures are intended to increase the number of salmon reaching spawning areas, specifically sockeye, pink and chum stocks.

Watershed Watch Salmon Society, a conservation group, called the move a “bold, necessary and courageous step.” 

“I think it stops the bleeding,” said Greg Taylor, the society’s fisheries adviser.

“I think it’s something that we have to start. We have to increase the number of fish returning to their spawning grounds. We don’t have time.” 

Jordan said the decline in fish stocks is because of a number of factors, including climate change, habitat degradation and the massive Big Bar landslide in the Fraser River. 

“I mean, it’s not all about overfishing,” she said.

“There is going to be no silver bullet that saves the salmon stock. It’s got to be an all-hands-on-deck approach.” 

The United Fishermen & Allied Workers’ Union said the closure of 79 salmon fisheries has left them “worried” about the future of commercial operations.

“Today’s closure announcements are deeply concerning,” Emily Orr, UFAWU-Unifor business agent, said in a statement.

“The abruptness of the announcement, and lack of transparency for how these specific closures were decided, have blindsided harvesters.” 

While a licence retirement program is needed, she said it is only one part of a multi-pronged approach that is required.

“We need habitat restoration and investments in hatcheries,” she added.

Andrew Trites, director of the marine mammal research unit at the University of British Columbia, said the closure of commercial fisheries will make a “huge difference” for small runs of salmon that are struggling to survive.

Each river has its own population of salmon where some are OK while others are in “real trouble,” he said.

“The problem is that when you’re fishing, you don’t know which river it’s coming from,” Trites said.

“And so you get strong runs mixed in with weak runs, and it has a much bigger effect on the small populations.”

Data from the North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission shows that the global catch of Pacific salmon in 2020 was the lowest since 1982. 

But the measures announced Tuesday will not produce immediate results because fish stocks may need multiple generations to stabilize and rebuild, Jordan noted.

“We may not see actual increases in the stock for a number of years, before we actually see that these measures are working,” she said.

“But we can’t wait because they’re at a point now where if we don’t do something now, there will be no fishery to have for generations to come.”

See article here . . . . .

Greg Taylor: 2021 salmon forecast amongst widespread closures

July 2, 2021 – Watershed Watch Salmon Society by Greg Taylor

I sit here heartbroken. This week, as I put together my annual salmon forecast, the fisheries minister’s announced she intends to close—for the long-term—most of B.C.’s commercial salmon fisheries. It is a bold and courageous decision, made necessary by the cascading impacts of the climate emergency on salmon and the ecosystems they inhabit. But it is also a declaration of past failures: failure to implement our highly-regarded national policies; failure to manage fisheries sustainably; and failure to make the difficult decisions when it most counted.

Climate emergency has forced gut-wrenching decisions

Tragically, commercial fishers will pay the price for our collective failure to address climate change, to adapt forest, land-use and water management practices in recognition of climate change and cumulative impacts, and to manage fisheries with precaution and according to established national and international policies.

I began my career co-managing a fleet of 80+ Indigenous gillnetters. By mid-career, I was managing a culturally and socially diverse fleet of 250+ gillnetters and 80 seiners. My fishermen came from communities throughout B.C.; from isolated First Nations communities such as Gitwangak, Gitanyow, and Alert Bay; from historical coastal communities such as Sointula; and from fishing-oriented lower mainland communities such as Ladner and Steveston. They were Indigenous, Japanese, Croatian, Norwegian, Icelandic, and from about every other settler community. They were our history; who we were as a province, and what made us who we are today. Everyone worked together, side by side, to harvest and process the bounty of salmon we enjoyed. In many ways, they were the best of who we want to be today.

I feel the heavy burden of guilt and sorrow for having failed them. 

The fisheries minister has promised to compensate fishers who want to leave the fishery through a licence retirement program. Since the minister has closed most of the fishery, the majority will likely want, and need, to get out. It is our obligation to make sure the compensation for fishers is robust and equitable. Their industry has been ravaged by the climate emergency and they require support to adjust.

Just as importantly, the resources for this compensation cannot come from the $647 million the minister promised for salmon conservation and restoration. We owe it to our salmon, and to these hard-working people, that every dollar of the $647 million is dedicated to recovering our salmon populations. The last series of licence retirements, ending in 1997, cost $460 million in 2021 dollars. Taking this money from the resources promised for salmon recovery would be pouring salt into our fishers’ wounds.

This 2021 salmon forecast may be my last one after some 35 years, for who needs forecasts if there are no fisheries? Although it captures why this bold action was necessary, please read closely. Our salmon are still out there, in streams throughout our province. Their numbers and diversity are a shadow of what they once were, but salmon are highly adaptable and given half a chance, they will recover. We owe it to our fishermen to see that they do. 

2021 B.C. salmon update and forecast

Nass River sockeye are forecast to return below average. Very early indications are that the run is below forecast. This fishery has been closed as part of the minister’s announcement.

Skeena River sockeye are expected to also be below average, but at a level that will support some mixed-stock gillnet and seine fisheries. (This fishery is one of the few in the province that will remain open). It is much too early in the return to provide a projection. The forecast is dependent on a strong five-year-old return as the four-year-old return is expected to be weak.

Nass pink returns are expected to be poor, but this is a fishery where we could have a surprise. (It is another fishery which will remain open). Alaskan managers are expecting a better year for Southeast Alaskan pinks based on fry out-migration surveys, and our far north B.C. pink streams often follow along. In addition, cooler ocean temperatures often lead B.C. salmon to migrate more directly to their spawning areas, avoiding some of the interception fisheries in Alaska. This can benefit other northern B.C. species as well. Unfortunately, Nass pinks co-migrate with northern chum, Chinook, coho, steelhead, and sockeye, all expected to be weak relative to their management objectives. While these species must be discarded alive, which can be a successful strategy using seine gear if the fishery is well-monitored, DFO does not require the same level of independent compliance monitoring of these fisheries as it does for groundfish, halibut and other important B.C. fisheries. 

Skeena pinks have collapsed over the past couple of decades and are expected to have a very poor return. The same with Skeena chums.

Nass Chinook and coho are expected to return at lower than desired levels. 

Skeena Chinook have declined—like so many other chinook populations from California through to Alaska—to where they are expected to return at critically low levels. Early indications suggest things might actually be worse than forecast. An active marine guide/outfitter mixed-stock fishery based out of Prince Rupert remains open. The in-river Chinook fishery enjoyed by locals is likely to be closed. Skeena coho returns are forecast to be poor. (After FSC, 95 per cent of B.C.’s Chinook and coho are allocated to the recreational fishery). 

Very high water levels in both the Nass and Skeena, and likely other rivers around the province, caused by the recent unprecedented heatwave, are making it difficult to estimate numbers of returning fish.

Area 6 pink salmon (Douglas Channel and its coastal approaches) are forecast to return below average. This population may see a better return if productivity is better than projected and they manage to avoid Alaskan interception fisheries. However, good fishing for Area 6 pinks would not be good news for the depressed wild chum and other stocks that co-migrate with the pinks and get caught as bycatch. This is another fishery that escaped the closure of most other B.C. commercial fisheries. Managers and fishers need to be aware that if they don’t improve the compliance monitoring in this fishery, it too will be in jeopardy.

Central Coast wild chum returns are generally expected to be poor. Enhanced chum returns from the Snootli Hatchery in Area 8 (Bella Coola) are expected to be average. Production of these hatchery chum complicated management because mixed-stock fisheries in Area 8 often over-harvested wild chums and under-harvested the enhanced chums. This fishery had a significant bearing on B.C.’s loss of Marine Stewardship Council eco-certification for our salmon fisheries. This fishery is now closed.

West coast of Vancouver Island (WCVI) may be interesting this year. A low to average sockeye return is forecast for Barkley Sound allowing for some fishing by all sectors and gear types. But a hot dry summer may derail the fishing season as warm water can lead to high pre-spawn mortalities; something managers will have to consider. Enhanced chums could have supported fisheries in several areas in the fall, some of which may have been quite productive. But these fisheries were part of the closure announcement. Enhanced Chinook will also likely support directed fisheries adjacent to hatcheries. Wild WCVI chinook populations are classified as threatened by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC; a federally mandated science body).

East Coast of Vancouver Island (ECVI) fisheries are dominated by hatchery production. Many wild populations—other than pinks—are classified as endangered or threatened. There should be average returns of enhanced chums to most major systems. Other than the limited Johnstone Strait mixed-stock fishery, these tend to be harvested in near-terminal commercial fisheries. These fisheries are now closed. Enhanced ECVI chinook, on the other hand, are harvested along with endangered ECVI chinook populations in mixed-stock recreational fisheries throughout the Strait of Georgia. These fisheries, being recreational, remain open. There should be some good recreational pink fishing opportunities in the southern portions of the ECVI. The fascinating outlier to most other ECVI streams producing wild salmon is the Cowichan River. It should continue to see average returns of wild chums, chinook, and even steelhead in 2021. This deserves an article unto itself as its success may point the way towards how we might conserve and recover salmon in the future.

Fraser River sockeye are divided into four management groups: Early Stuart, Early Summer, Summer, and Late. Within each management group are numerous distinct populations with divergent productivity and run-timing. And the migration timing of the four management groups overlap each other. It’s like an immense jigsaw puzzle where none of the pieces quite fit with one another. Recent environmental trends have reduced productivity and increased forecast uncertainty for most component populations and the Big Bar slide still hovers large over this year’s return. Given the inherent management complexity, and that several populations have been declared endangered, it is little wonder that this commercial fishery has been closed for all gear types (gillnet, seine, troll), including for First Nations. The wonder is that we were arrogant enough, at least in recent times when productivity was low and risk was high, to think it was ever possible to mount sustainable mixed-stock fisheries on Fraser sockeye.

Fraser pink salmon are forecast to return at low levels in 2021. There is the potential for the return to be better than predicted. This is because if there is any improvement in marine conditions, as many indicators suggest, it is pink salmon—which have a two-year life cycle—that will show the benefits first. Further, the 2021 pink forecast has little good data to support it. Because of COVID, the fry out-migration in 2020 was not monitored, and the 2019 escapements were poorly assessed. This fishery is now closed to all commercial gear types.

Fraser chums returning this fall are forecast to return below their management objective. The forecast is based on the poor 2017 escapements and continued poor environmental conditions for salmon generally. This fishery was part of the closure announcement.

Fraser Chinook are grouped into Fraser 4-2s, Spring and Summer 5-2s, Fraser 4-1s and Fall 4-1s. The difference is Chinook designated with a ‘2’ spend their first year after hatching in freshwater before migrating to the ocean. The forecast for 4-2s and 5-2s is very poor. The 4-2 migration peaks in June in the Fraser River. The 5-2 migration peaks in late July. However, there is considerable overlap because, similar to Fraser sockeye, each of these stock groupings consists of multiple component populations with varied productivity and migration timing. Hence, you will find 4-2 and 5-2 Fraser Chinook both returning between March and mid-August. Both stock groupings are classified as endangered by COSEWIC. These fish are encountered in mixed-stock marine recreational fisheries from southwest Vancouver Island seaward of Barkley Sound through to the Fraser River, very limited in-river First Nations Treaty and Food fisheries, and by IUU (Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated) fisheries in the Fraser River. There is next to no commercial harvest of these populations because they tend to migrate directly in from the Pacific Ocean through the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The forecast for these stock groupings is very poor. Current assessments suggest they are returning even less than forecast. Many of these populations are also impacted by the Big Bar slide. Recreational fisheries impacting these populations continue.

Fraser 4-1 Chinook are forecast to be abundant and will likely support commercial, First Nations, and recreational fisheries from the Alaska border through to their spawning grounds in and around the Thompson and Shuswap Rivers and their tributaries. Their migration timing is from mid-July to mid-September. These fish spawn in rivers that enter the Fraser below the Big Bar slide and therefore remain unaffected by it. 

Fraser Fall 4-1s are the only Fraser Chinook with a biologically-based escapement goal (the number of fish required to make it back to the spawning grounds). Unlike Alaska, or the southern states, DFO does not have biologically-based escapement goals for most salmon populations. Alaskan managers are mandated by the state’s constitution to ensure escapement goals are achieved for salmon returning to Alaskan rivers. Canada does not employ the same rigour. The reason Fraser Fall 4-1s have an escapement goal is that they are managed by the Pacific Salmon Treaty between Canada and the U.S. Fraser Fall 4-1s have not achieved their escapement goal for a decade and Canada is under considerable pressure to address its failure on the issue. These Chinook are important contributors to the marine mixed-stock recreational and First Nations food and treaty fisheries. They are not harvested by commercial fisheries and are therefore not included in the commercial closures announced by the minister. Fall 4-1s migrate into the Fraser River from mid-August to mid-November, peaking in late September through early October. As these populations spawn in the lower Fraser River and its tributaries, they are not impacted by the Big Bar slide.

Interior Fraser coho are classified as threatened. They return from late August through September and are therefore vulnerable to being encountered in any mixed-stock recreational or commercial fishery along their migratory path. Canadian total mortalities are limited to 3 per cent but monitoring and assessments are poor. There is limited data on lower Fraser coho but their status is of growing concern for First Nations in the area.

Steelhead returning to the Thomson and Chilcotin Rivers are past being endangered. They are on the cusp of being extirpated. DFO managers have suppressed scientific advice on commercial fishery impacts on steelhead. All fisheries that may have indirectly killed Thompson steelhead were closed by the minister’s announcement.

See full article here . . . .

Wild salmon in hot water

July 15th, 2021 – Watershed Watch Salmon Society

After a record-breaking heatwave, and with continuing drought and wildfires across the province, B.C.’s wild salmon are in extreme danger. And there’s a lot more that our governments could do to defend our salmon from these impacts of global warming.

In B.C., 32 populations of Chinook, sockeye and steelhead are now listed as “endangered” or “threatened” by the federal Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, with many more who deserve to be added to the list.

Many of these endangered salmon swim home to water-stressed parts of the province, including the Thompson River and its tributaries, and the east coast of Vancouver Island where over-extraction and scarcity of water during droughts is a serious problem. 

Many people think of super-natural B.C. as having limitless fresh water. Unfortunately, that is simply not true. Across the province, over 60% of British Columbians live in water-stressed areas. With a growing population and a warming climate, the stress on our rivers and salmon is only going to get worse.

For salmon populations already impacted by multiple threats including pollution, loss of habitats, diseases from salmon farms, inbreeding of hatchery fish, and poorly managed fisheries, low flows and rising water temperatures may be too much to bear.

So what can be done?

Besides addressing our greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible, the most important thing we can do to give wild salmon a chance to survive extreme drought conditions is to get more water flowing in our rivers and streams. 

We have a law which gives the Province the power and mandate to regulate water use for nature as well as people, the 2016 Water Sustainability Act. Now we need the Province to get serious about implementing it. In the five years since this much-improved version of B.C.’s water law was passed, only a small fraction of its provisions have been put into effect. For example, the B.C. government is about to miss their own deadline for licensing and regulating groundwater use, which has major impacts on nearby salmon streams.

That’s why Watershed Watch, in partnership with other allies, launched CodeBlue BC, a plan to secure and sustain B.C.’s fresh water sources for generations to come.

The CodeBlue BC plan has three parts:

  1. Get tough on water wasters and polluters. Good resource development should never degrade our watersheds, or waste our fresh water. Tougher rules, better enforcement, and stronger penalties will make resource companies clean up their act.
  2. Make big industrial users pay. Our water is priceless, and most British Columbians agree it should never be sold. However, B.C.’s system of water licences lets big industry pay pennies to use our water, while British Columbians are stuck cleaning up the messes they leave behind. This needs to change: it’s time to make industrial users pay the true cost of using B.C.’s water.
  3. Give local people control over local water sources. B.C.’s water sources should be owned and managed by the people who know them best and need them most. By providing local people with the funding, training and authority to look after their water sources, we can create surge of good jobs in every corner of B.C.

It’s time we start treating our watersheds like our lives depend on them. 

Read the plan. Add your voice to CodeBlue BC and help us pressure Premier Horgan to protect B.C.’s fresh water, wild salmon and the watersheds we all depend on.

See full article here. . . . . .

Decades of cuts to salmon monitoring leave B.C. scientists uncertain of fish populations

February 18, 2021 – The Narwhal by Matt Simmons,

For 40 years, Doug Stewart coordinated his movements with spawning salmon on B.C.’s north coast, climbing up creeks to count the fish as they returned from the ocean.

His job as a creekwalker — a contract salmon monitoring gig for Fisheries and Oceans Canada — took him places no one would think fish could reach, he told The Narwhal. One November, after wading through a frozen lake with his canoe in tow, he followed a creek up through a frozen meadow and counted coho in slow-flowing pools covered with thin ice.

“It was something that’ll stick in my head forever. Those are the kinds of things that keep drawing you back.”

When Stewart reluctantly retired in 2016, no one took over for him, leaving an area of about 17,000 square kilometres to the last remaining creekwalker in the region. “Even when there was two of us, we still weren’t doing the job properly,” he said.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada has been hiring creekwalkers to count salmon returning to natal streams along the Pacific coast since 1940. These creekwalkers provide essential information about populations, which is used to inform fisheries management decisions, including how many salmon can be caught for commercial or recreational purposes.

However, decades of budget cuts have greatly reduced the number of creekwalkers and the number of streams being monitored, while wild salmon populations have been declining. Critics say the data collected by creekwalkers is needed to make good fisheries management decisions.

“From a conservation perspective, we need this information to assess the health of populations,” Michael Price, a salmon researcher at Simon Fraser University, told The Narwhal in an interview. “We can’t accurately make fisheries decisions when we don’t know how many fish are coming back.”

PacificWild, a conservation organization focused on the Great Bear Rainforest, recently launched a campaign to call attention to the declining number of creekwalkers on the north and central coast and what that means for salmon.

In 1949, there were 150 creekwalkers monitoring the north coast; by the late 1970s there were 40 and now there are just two, according to research by the organization. PacificWild has also found that only 215 of 2,500 spawning streams on the central and north coast are being counted. That’s about a 70 per cent decrease since the 1980s, when around 1,500 of those streams were monitored.

PacificWild does not have data on how many creekwalkers are monitoring streams on the south coast nor how many streams there are being monitored.

According to research by Price and others, Fisheries and Oceans Canada has continually cut funding for monitoring since the 1980s. When Fisheries and Oceans Canada announced a wild salmon policy in 2005, which prioritized the conservation of Pacific salmon and acknowledged a need to preserve biological diversity, conservation scientists expected the department would increase monitoring efforts.

“That was Objective 1: to identify populations that we need to protect in perpetuity,” Price said. Yet, the decline continued.

In the absence of data collected by creekwalkers, Fisheries and Oceans Canada estimates B.C. salmon populations by counting the fish at just a few sites in larger systems, doing aerial surveys and tagging fish at downstream locations and creating a population model based on how many show up farther inland.

But according to Price, the accuracy of those estimates can be off by as much as 50 per cent and it’s impossible to know what’s happening to individual populations without monitoring streams.

Price added that without “boots on the ground,” the data lacks critical context.

“If we’re just flying over and looking at the spawning reach of a system, and not literally walking up the entire system, you don’t know if there are blockages in the system, or disease events, or pre-spawn mortality because the water temperatures were high, or big predation years.”

Price said creekwalkers carry irreplaceable knowledge of the spawning sites they visit year after year. This informs a deeper understanding of anomalies and fluctuations in salmon returns, which in turn informs fisheries management.

For example, Stewart said there was an unexpected large early return of pink salmon to the glacial-fed freshwater systems in the region last year. Fisheries and Oceans Canada decided to open the commercial fisheries, but because the decision was not informed by creekwalkers’ knowledge, it resulted in an error that left many creeks without enough fish to sustain the populations.

“Without the patrolmen out there, the department wasn’t able to realize that this wasn’t going to be a continuous thing through all the systems,” he said. “They actually overfished because they didn’t realize that the secondary [returns], what we call the fall pinks, weren’t coming. You’ve got to have people in the field to see so that you can actually make good management decisions.”

Fisheries and Oceans Canada declined an interview request and was unable to provide any information.

Price gave credit to Fisheries and Oceans Canada for erring on the side of caution by dramatically limiting the commercial and sport fisheries over the past few years, but added that increasing data could only have a positive impact.

“If we had more information, I would like to believe that we would make more informed decisions,” he said. “But right now, we are flying blind.”

When Stewart retired, the Kitasoo/Xai’xais First Nation started counting spawning salmon in around 15 of the 150 streams in his former monitoring area. They receive a small amount of funding from Fisheries and Oceans Canada and share their data with the department.

Kitasoo/Xai’xais fisheries director Larry Greba said they’re trying to cover a handful of streams that are representative of other streams.

“In the absence of that information, you have no idea what’s going on with stocks,” he said. “Unfortunately, in some cases they seem to be going — I hate to use the word — extinct. We’ve got a number of systems in the area that have just gone to next to nothing.”

But Greba said he’d like to see Fisheries Minister Bernadette Jordan allocate more resources for Indigenous monitoring programs and said her recent mandate letter from the prime minister, which calls for the development of a Pacific salmon strategy, offers a glimmer of hope.

Other coastal nations, including the Heiltsuk and Gitga’at, have similarly started monitoring streams in the absence of Fisheries and Oceans Canada programs. Fraser Los, communications coordinator for the Coastal Stewardship Network, told The Narwhal in an email that efforts are underway to standardize the methods of data collection and make sure they’re compatible with Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Los said Coastal First Nations are working on digitizing data collection as part of a regional monitoring system.

Price agreed that coordinating monitoring methods is key and added that increasing our knowledge of how many fish are out there doesn’t have to be a huge investment.

“It’s not rocket science. It just takes those adventurous individuals that would like to tramp up streams and count fish.”

The federal and provincial governments have earmarked more than $140 million for salmon conservation programs through the British Columbia Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund, including some monitoring programs.

B.C. Parliamentary Secretary for Fisheries and Aquaculture Fin Donnelly said the province is committed to working with the federal government and First Nations.

“I think there’s a recognition that we have to do things differently,” he said. “We have to be innovative, we have to work together and collaborate, and we need action now.”

He said the province has started to fund Indigenous guardian programs to help address the problem, citing a $7.3 million investment in the Broughton archipelago, where Minister Jordan recently decided to phase out open-net pen salmon farms by 2022. He said the funding includes support for monitoring programs.

Biologist Alexandra Morton suggested creating a new senior position within Fisheries and Oceans Canada to coordinate this collaboration.

“We need a director of wild salmon.”

While many populations are on the brink of extinction, Morton said salmon can survive given the chance. “The ocean and the rivers can still make fish. People should not give up.”

Stewart saw what was at stake last summer while anchored with his family in a “gin-clear” river where he used to see around 60,000 chum and 60,000 pink salmon returning every year. He estimated only about 500 chum returned last year.

“We’re watching this sow grizzly with two cubs, and there’s no pinks available yet so she’s hunting chums. And I mean she’s stalking them.”

He chuckled and said she was pretty good at it, but added there were probably another dozen grizzlies in the area all trying to catch the fish.

“All of a sudden you don’t have enough chum in that system to supply the bears and to supply the future stock of chums,” he said. “The bears are getting what they can get and you’re hoping like hell [the fish] at least got a few eggs into the gravel before they became bear protein.”

See full article here . . . . . . . .

How global warming is affecting B.C. salmon

(A recap of DFO’s annual State of the Salmon assessment) Watershed Watch Salmon Society

February 11, 2021

Many factors contribute to the decline of wild salmon in B.C. Habitat destruction, harvest, and bad aquaculture practices are all negative impacts, but the effect global warming has on salmon populations will be widespread, long-lasting and irreversible without urgent action. 

DFO recently released a preliminary report on predicted salmon returns for 2021. You can read a summary of the report by fisheries expert Greg Taylor here, but, in general, many salmon runs across the province have been in decline and 2021 isn’t expected to be any different. But, unprecedented environmental conditions are making predictions of salmon returns in recent years more difficult to make. 

Every year, DFO’s State of the Salmon Program collects research on environmental changes from a variety of sources to better understand and inform salmon return predictions for the following year. They recently presented on the current environmental conditions and the implications for wild salmon in 2021. 

Read a recap of the presentation below.

Increasing global temperatures and changes in precipitation = warmer waterways

Research shows global air temperatures are trending hotter than expected in recent decades. Five of the last six years were the hottest on record. The situation gets more dire as you move closer to the north pole, as temperatures are increasing more rapidly than they are at the equator. Warmer air temperatures globally lead to warmer water temperatures locally and for species, including salmon, that thrive in colder waters, this is very harmful. 

In B.C., global warming is contributing to smaller snowpacks. A smaller than average snowpack means lower than average flow in rivers and streams and in turn, higher water temperatures.

B.C. is also experiencing drier summers, with less precipitation, leading to a similar bad outcome for salmon; less flow and water that gets warmer, faster. 

While temperatures above 25 degrees will kill salmon, temperatures above 18 degrees alter the behaviour of adult salmon, making it harder for them to swim, escape predators and dig their nests. Warm waters also impair salmons’ immune systems, making it harder for them to survive the effects of viruses and other pathogens.

In some cases, lack of precipitation can also result in some sections of streams or rivers drying up, leaving fish stranded in small pools of water and unable to migrate.

Record-setting forest fires are degrading spawning habitat

2017 and 2018 were both record-setting forest fire years in the province. Where these fires occur, the lack of tree cover and changes to soil results in increased runoff, slope instability, and erosion, all contributing to more sediment entering streams. This negatively affects salmon spawning habitat by covering spawning gravels and smothering redds (salmon nests).

Forest fires also destroy riparian vegetation. Without riparian vegetation to shade waterways, stream temperatures increase even more and further stress wild salmon.

More landslides, more disconnected habitat

Global warming is also thought to be increasing the occurrence of landslides. This has the potential to block access for salmon to their spawning grounds and can have a huge impact on specific runs.

Ocean conditions: the good, the bad, and the blob

Things aren’t just changing for salmon in their freshwater environments; marine conditions are also changing. The bad news? Oceans are absorbing much of the excess heat resulting from a warming climate. Even with intervention to address climate change, it will take some time for these expansive water bodies to drop in temperature. Increased ocean temperatures are thought to reduce overall ocean productivity and change the availability of different zooplankton, a primary food source for salmon. Larger, fattier zooplankton are being replaced by smaller, less nutritious species, and fewer of them, meaning there is less, and lower quality food for salmon in the ocean. Underfed and smaller fish don’t have the same energy stores to make the trip back to their spawning grounds. At the same time, wild salmon are having to compete with growing numbers of hatchery fish for these dwindling food supplies.

The west coast has also been home to “the blob” off and on since 2013. The blob is a patch of ocean stretching from California to Alaska with water temperatures even higher than the rest of the (warming) Pacific. The good news is that the recent presence of La Niňa, a period of cooler water temperatures in the south, will likely help to mitigate the warmer waters of the blob, and also increase precipitation locally, which will be beneficial to salmon in their freshwater habitat as well.

What’s our take-away?

Clearly, a changing climate is making freshwater and marine habitat less hospitable to wild salmon. Though they are resilient, how much closer to the brink can we push them before there is no coming back? While climate change is a global issue, we need our governments to step up and invest in salmon-friendly renewable energy and reduce rather than expand our production and use of harmful fossil fuels like oil and fracked gas. We need to swiftly tackle the threats to salmon that we have immediate control over. That means protecting, restoring and reconnecting key habitats (an investment that will also create jobs and support local economies), getting salmon farms out of the water, safer approaches to fishing and hatchery production, and better monitoring so we can understand the current status of different salmon populations.

See article here. . . . . . .

*********************************************************************

DFO is making new fishing rules. Will they work?

National Observer by Marc Fawcett-Atkinson |  January 29th 2021

Only 293,000 sockeye salmon returned to the Fraser River last year; an uncomfortable echo of the Newfoundland cod collapse. New federal rules aim to prevent similar disasters. Photo by Wikimedia Commons/U.S. Dept. of Interior

In 1992, Canadians watched in horror as Newfoundland’s once-thriving cod stocks collapsed, leaving thousands without jobs and ecosystems transformed.

Yet despite the horror, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has not been legally required to rebuild depleted fish stocks even as others, including the iconic salmon runs in B.C., have hit historic lows. That soon might change.

Earlier this month, the federal government proposed a suite of changes to Canada’s fishing regulations that will force DFO to bring depleted commercial fish stocks back to abundant levels. It’s a move advocates say is a step in the right direction, but still might not be enough to restore oceanic abundance.

“We’ve seen big declines in our fish and marine fisheries in the last 50 years … we’re clearly not on the right trajectory, which means the status quo is not working,” said Josh Laughren, executive director of Oceana Canada. “The (proposed) regulations as done now, in our view … will not succeed in changing the status quo and getting us on a path to rebuilding our fish stocks.”

The proposed rules codify pre-existing internal DFO policies and require the ministry to assess the health of key fish populations in “batches” — salmon, rockfish and cod are in the first batch of 30 — to figure out why their populations have declined (or could decline) and lay out a plan to bring the stocks back to healthy levels. If the ministry doesn’t comply or opens a threatened fishery, it could be sued. Similar, but more stringent, regulations have been successfully implemented in other jurisdictions with major fisheries, like the U.S. and the EU.

The problem, Laughren said, is the rules lack key details: the rebuilding targets are too low, there’s no strict timeline to rebuild individual stocks, and the time between listing each batch of fish stocks is too long. Taken together, those issues could give the ministry room to avoid implementing policies leading to long-term health for fish stocks and fisheries, he said — at the cost of immediate social, economic, and political pain.

“If I were a fisherman, I would be in the long-term glad that these (rules) will be in place, because there’s no fishing communities if we have no fish,” said Susanna Fuller, vice-president of operations and projects at Oceans North. In the short term, however, closing vulnerable fisheries is a “hard decision” DFO has been too reluctant to make, she said.

More stringent rules actually make it easier for the ministry to tackle those difficult decisions, she said, because they lay out a very clear decision-making process. That makes it harder for the fisheries minister to allow fishing of at-risk stocks under pressure from industry and fishing communities concerned about their future.

More than 77,000 people work in the fisheries across Canada, according to DFO. In B.C. alone, the industry was worth about $760 million in 2018, says the provincial agriculture ministry.

“My hope is that the fisheries’ management system can be flexible and dynamic enough to help move fish harvesters to other species as they become more abundant,” Fuller said, helping ease the negative social and economic impacts of closed fisheries.

“Stronger regulations (can) actually give us the tools to rebuild fisheries and reduce pain on fishing communities,” she said.

Earlier this month, the federal government proposed changes to Canada’s fishing regulations to bring depleted commercial fish stocks back to abundant levels. It’s a move advocates say is a step in the right direction, but not enough.

Marc Fawcett-Atkinson / Local Journalism Initiative / Canada’s National Observer

See full article here. . . . . .

**************************************************

Our Amazing Community

by Gayle Neilson, Coast Reporter, Sunshine Coast, BC

January 28, 2021

Chaster Creek, Spawning Survey 2020 Photo Credit Brian Thicke

“Streamkeeper co-ordinator Shirley Samples reported some good news about the 2020 salmon spawning season in her New Year’s email. The group has been tracking salmon for the past two years in four creeks: Chaster Creek, Roberts Creek, Langdale Creek and Malcolm Creek. Shirley said, “The numbers increased substantially in Roberts Creek and Chaster Creek! Also, the chum salmon that did return were notably large in size. The number of coho returns were less than 2019; we hope that number will increase as this species is important to our whole ecosystem but especially for southern resident orcas that depend on them.” She thanked all the streamkeepers for their volunteer efforts. More info at https://sunshinecoaststreamkeepers.com/ ” – Coast Reporter

See full article here…….

****************************************************

Watch your step! Salmon eggs may be underfoot

Posted January 14, 2021

See full article here……

Sockeye Redds

Sockeye redds. Photo: Jonny Armstrong

Between fall and spring, spawning grounds are full of salmon redds, gravel nests dug by spawning females, containing thousands of eggs, (which develop into alevins). The redd protects eggs and alevins from predators and from washing away in heavy stream flows, but being well hidden on the ground makes them susceptible to unwitting trampling by people, pets and livestock.

How bad is it if you step on a redd and how can you avoid it?

Limited data has been collected on the impact of human activity on salmon redds. However, studies on trout redds show that trampling can cause mortality rates between 43 – 96 per cent. A similar rate applied to wild salmon redds could be disastrous, especially for endangered populations. 

Though trampling of redds isn’t a large cause of the decline of wild salmon, it is one of the few threats that we can easily remedy with a bit of awareness.Sockeye alevin

Sockeye alevin. Photo: Natalie Sopinka

Here are some tips for identifying and avoiding salmon redds.

Timing

Be especially vigilant for salmon redds between September and March in most locations in B.C. 

Do you see adult salmon?

If you visit a waterway and adult salmon are present, it is likely a spawning stream. Keep out of the river and keep pets on leashes to prevent damage to redds.

Know where redds are found in a stream

  • Pools vs. riffles. Pools occur where stream depth increases and flow decreases. Riffles are shallower sections of the waterway where the water moves more quickly. Riffles are preferred locations for salmon redds as the increased flow of water helps keep the redd well-oxygenated for baby salmon. 
  • Substrate. Salmon redds are made in gravel 15- 35 mm in diameter (pea to peach pit size). It needs to be small enough for the females to be able to move it and create their nest, but large enough that it doesn’t smother the eggs by getting too densely packed. 
  • Location. Be more vigilant when walking in or through the middle of a stream.  Salmon often spawn close to the centre of streams, not close to the banks.
  • Water depth. Most salmon spawn in relatively shallow water of a few feet or less. 

What does a redd look like?

  • Look for clean gravel. The act of creating a redd involves the female salmon disturbing gravel, which makes the circular area of about 1-2 m in diameter that has cleaner looking gravel than the surrounding area.
  • Look for a combination of a mound and a depression in the gravel. The mound, where the eggs are located, will be downstream of the depression. 

Additional Resources

https://mindtheredd.org/mindful-steps/

https://www.flyfishingtraditions.com/what-the-heck-are-salmon-redds-anyway/January 14th, 2021|0 CommentsFacebookTwitterEmail

*********************************************

Posted January 14, 2021

Potential designation of Howe Sound as UNESCO biosphere reserve expected in 2021

See full article here…….

by Carlito Pablo on January 12th, 2021 

The Howe Sound, a deep fjord extending from West Vancouver to Squamish, is home to rare glass sponge reefs.
  • The Howe Sound, a deep fjord extending from West Vancouver to Squamish, is home to rare glass sponge reefs.SHUTTERSTOCK

Later this year, Canada may get its 19th UNESCO-designated biosphere reserve.

If all goes well, that recognition will go to a region in the Howe Sound or Átl’ka7tsem in Indigenous language.

The Howe Sound is a deep fjord extending from West Vancouver to Squamish.

It is home to glass sponge reefs, a rare kind found only along the west coast of Canada and the U.S.

The Howe Sound Biosphere Region Initiative Society has spearheaded the initiative to designate 218,723 hectares in the area as a UNESCO biosphere reserve.

According to a summary by the organization, the proposed reserve is composed of 84 percent terrestrial area, and 16 percent marine environments of the Howe Sound.

Online, UNESCO or the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization explains that there are currently 714 biosphere reserves around the world.

These are “learning places for sustainable development”, and found in 129 countries.

At present, Canada has 18 UNESCO biosphere reserves.

“They are sites for testing interdisciplinary approaches to understanding and managing changes and interactions between social and ecological systems, including conflict prevention and management of biodiversity,” UNESCO explains.

Moreover, “They are places that provide local solutions to global challenges. Biosphere reserves include terrestrial, marine and coastal ecosystems. Each site promotes solutions reconciling the conservation of biodiversity with its sustainable use.”

Biosphere reserves are nominated by national governments. These reserves remain under the jurisdiction of the countries where they are located.

An information material by the Howe Sound Biosphere Region Initiative Society notes that in 2000, Clayoquot Sound and Mt. Arrowsmith on Vancouver Island were designated biosphere regions.

The climate action committee of Metro Vancouver is scheduled to receive on Friday (January 15) an update about the potential designation of Átl’ka7tsem/Howe Sound as a UNESCO biosphere reserve.

A summary of the presentation by Ruth Simons of the Howe Sound Biosphere Region Initiative Society notes that an international advisory committee will review the submission by the government of Canada.

The recommendations from the review panel are expected to be known in either April or May.

A formal UNESCO designation could be announced in the in the fall or winter.

The summary also cites the global significance of Howe Sound’s glass sponge reefs.

“Scientists have likened the discovery of glass sponge reefs in B.C. to discovering a herd of dinosaurs on land,” the document states.

These reefs provide habitat for 84-plus species of fish and invertebrates.

“They provide essential services for Howe Sound by filtering 17+ billion litres (6,800 Olympic swimming pools) of water every day,” the summary states.

It notes that the reefs would take “just two hours to pump the equivalent of Metro Vancouver’s daily wastewater volume and they remove 436 kg of total organic carbon from the water each day”. Follow Carlito Pablo on Twitter at @carlitopablo

************************************************

Forage Fish in the Salish Sea

Pacific Sand Lance, Surf Smelt, Pacific Herring, and Northern Anchovy

Strait of Georgia Data Centre

Posted on January 8, 2021

See full article here……

Forage fish are a small schooling fish that play a crucial role in the marine food web, directly feeding many marine animals including orcas, birds, and salmon. Their role as prey underpins the health of our ocean ecosystems and their importance to the survival of salmon populations in the Salish Sea.¹

Forage fish are also integral to indigenous communities. The Coast Salish people depend on salmon not only as a food source, but salmon are deeply embedded in their culture, identity, wealth and trade. 

Additionally, forage fish are also a direct food source for many indigenous communities.² For example, several Northwest Coast groups traditionally collect herring spawn accumulated on marine vegetation, providing a snack of dried herring eggs on kelp.³ As forage fish face threats, so too will the indigenous communities whose traditional knowledge has taught co-existence with these species for centuries.

Types of Forage Fish

Pacific Herring

  • Are one of the most abundant fish in BC’s coastal waters.
  • Are a cornerstone of the marine food web and support a diversity of marine predators.⁴
  • Have sustained coastal First Nations communities for many thousands of years. 
  • Are crucial prey of Chinook salmon.
  • Spawn en masse on marine vegetation such as eelgrass and kelp.

Northern Anchovy

  • Spawn throughout the year with peak activity from February to April.
  • Adults have been spotted following warm years when larval recruitment is likely more successful.⁵
  • Are a forage fish that have recently been increasing in abundance in the Salish Sea.⁵ Continued warming of the Salish Sea may lead to greater abundance and persistence of anchovy, with potentially important consequences for the ecosystem as a whole.

Surf Smelt

  • Are a forage fish that grow to be 20–25 cm long, and feed on small organisms.⁶ 
  • Spawn on gravel and sand beaches near the high tide line, where overhanging vegetation protects the eggs from the summer sun.⁶ 
  • Support recreational and commercial fisheries in B.C. 

Pacific Sand Lance

  • Are a small but crucial forage fish due to their role as forage for marine fish, birds, and mammals.⁶ 
  • Adults are up to 20cm long, slightly smaller than Surf smelt.⁶ 
  • Are an important food source for Chinook salmon.
  • Spawn on sandy intertidal beaches, much like Surf smelt.

Interactive map of forage fish spawning habitat in the Strait of Georgia

(Data for Northern Anchovy spawn currently unavailable)

Threats Faced

Even small alterations to forage fish spawning habitat can lead to considerable change over time. Forage fish spawning beaches are undergoing a coastal squeeze, where they experience both the impacts of shoreline development on land and climatic conditions from the sea.⁷ There are a number of factors reducing the quantity and quality of beach habitat for forage fish spawning.

Climate Change

  • Will affect the survival of forage fish as rising sea levels increase efforts to protect shorelines, resulting in increased loss of beach habitat.³
  • Is causing increased sea surface temperatures and ocean acidity which will likely affect forage fish larval survival.⁵
  • Can also reduce availability of zooplankton and phytoplankton which are prey for forage fish.

Development

  • Near spawning grounds can also pose as a threat to forage fish populations.
  • Through installation of docks can block sunlight for nearshore environments.
  • Such as construction, log storage, and decreases in water quality, especially as a result of oil spills, can degrade or destroy this important habitat as well.⁵

Hardening of the foreshore

  • Is the largest threat as these species rely on healthy shorelines for survival.
  • Can impact beach sediment drift which can lead to sediment loss and degrading spawning habitat quality.¹
  • Can also limit sediment exchange in the shallow subtidal where sand lance are known to burrow.³

Disease and Parasitism

  • Also impact forage fish, specifically Pacific Herring. Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus IVa (VHSV-IVa) is a deadly disease that increases mortality of Pacific Herring. Herring and other forage species are exceptionally susceptible to VHSV and are considered to be natural reservoir hosts for the virus.⁸
  • Parasites in the form of sea lice (C. clemensi) also infest herring. They can influence recruitment and population growth via direct mortality, and sub-lethal effects. Herring may serve as a natural reservoir host population for C. clemensi, exposing this parasite to the juvenile salmon that feed on them.⁹

Overfishing

  • Is also a threat to forage fish as they are increasingly targeted directly by humans for fish meal or other purposes.
  • Played a large part in BC’s herring population collapse of the 1960’s.⁴
  • Can put pressure on local stocks, changing population structure and recruitment success of populations.
  • Can be managed. Commercial fisheries are not the largest threat to forage fish when operated sustainably.

Protecting coastal habitats for forage fish helps ensure that they can continue to spawn, and ensures that the vital role they play in the food chain is not interrupted. Determining which beaches are integral spawning habitat has been the focus of a network of researchers and citizen scientists around the Salish Sea.

Research, Restoration & Monitoring

Forage Fish Spawning Beach Monitoring Network

In a multi-organizational effort, scientists and volunteer citizen scientists are working to reduce the knowledge gapregarding when and where forage fish species spawn. The success of these projects hinge on these citizen scientists, community members who are interested in contributing to scientific research, in order to simultaneously cover a greater geographic extent.

Monitoring teams work to identify active forage fish spawning sites through the collection and identification of suitable sediment for forage fish embryos (Pacific sand lance and/or surf smelt), from beaches with known favorable habitat characteristics.⁶

Beach spawning surveys for forage fish embryos will provide the data necessary to identify crucial spawning beaches that are at risk, thus guiding advocation for improved regulatory protections. 

Watch the video by Project Watershed Society to learn more about the forage fish monitoring process.

Click here to view a map that visualizes the results of efforts to monitor forage fish spawning habitat in the Strait of Georgia. With thousands of surveys conducted, experts are forming a picture of which beaches are vital to Pacific sand lance and Surf smelt.

Coho and Chinook Adult Diet Program

Forage fish are also being monitored in alternate ways. The Coho and Chinook Adult Diet Program coordinated by the University of Victoria (UVic), aims to use stomachs of adult Coho and Chinook to better understand changes in marine ecosystems. Looking at what the salmon are eating and how this changes in time and space, allows us to understand fluctuations in populations of their prey, such as herring or other forage fish. 

The program involves recreational anglers as citizen scientists to collect data year-round throughout the Salish Sea. These volunteers collect stomachs of adult fish which are then processed by students and staff at UVic.

The results so far indicate that Pacific herring are by far the most important prey for both Chinook and Coho, providing a food source year-round. Another finding observed a recent surge in Northern anchovypopulations in the Southern Strait, with anchovies comprising up to 30 per cent of the adult salmon diet in areas of abundance. Learn more about the project here or via their Facebook page.

How Can We Protect Forage Fish Spawning Habitat?

To better understand the jurisdictional landscape around the foreshore, WWF-Canada requested the services of the University of Victoria’s Environmental Law Centre to help untangle the jurisdictional complexity of the foreshore, and to determine which levels of government are best positioned to change policies to better protect forage fish spawning habitat. The Environmental Law Centre’s Report recommended the need for a new provincial act, titled the Shoreline Protection Act, to protect beach spawning habitat.

WWF-Canada is collaborating with stakeholders and partners to advocate for better provincial coastal strategies and law reform. The data collected by the Forage Fish Monitoring Network will also identify those beaches that have been degraded from human activities (e.g. sea walls) that likely require restoration opportunities, such as beach nourishment or shoreline restoration.

Value of citizen science

The research being done on forage fish is imperative to the ecosystem as a whole. These projects and citizen scientists are filling knowledge and data gaps of forage fish abundance, spawning locations and timing. By hosting these data in the Pacific Salmon Foundation’s database (Strait of Georgia Data Centre) they will be accessible freely to any parties at all times.

The data acquired through these projects can be used to make educated decisions for protection of spawning habitats and stocks. This includes potential management modifications to beaches which could reduce threats to forage fish spawning habitat.

********************************************************************************

December 18, 2020

Discovery Islands salmon farms to be phased out of existence over next 18 months

Great news for the health of our salmon stocks!

Decision made in consultation with local First Nations, minister says

Karin Larsen · CBC News · Posted: Dec 17, 2020

The Okisollo fish farm near Campbell River, B.C. Fisheries Minister Bernadette Jordan said Thursday all fish farms in the Discovery Islands near Campbell River will be phased out by June 2022. First Nations in the area have long said the farms contribute to the collapse of wild Fraser River salmon stocks because sea lice and other pathogens transfer from them to migrating juvenile wild salmon. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)

The controversial open-net salmon farms in the Discovery Islands near Campbell River, B.C., will be phased out over the next 18 months.

In making the announcement, Fisheries Minister Bernadette Jordan said all 19 farms have to be free of fish by June 30, 2022, when their renewed 18-month licences expire, and that no new fish can be brought in. 

Jordan said the decision was difficult but reflects the consultations she had with seven First Nations: the Homalco, Klahoose, K’ómoks, Kwaikah, Tla’amin, We Wai Kai and Wei Wai Kum. 

“We heard overwhelmingly from First Nations in the area that they do not want these fish farms there,” she said. “They feel that they should have a say in their territorial waters, and I absolutely agree with them.”

Chief Darren Blaney of the Homalco  First Nation said he was pleased with the outcome, noting the cultural importance and significance of salmon to his nation. 

“[Wild, local] stocks have been declining over the years,” Blaney said. “Salmon are pretty resilient. I think if we give them an opportunity, they will start to rebuild.”

For years, critics of the farms have said they are contributing to the collapse of wild Fraser River salmon stocks because sea lice and other pathogens transfer from the farms to migrating juvenile wild salmon as they swim through the narrow channels to get to the ocean. 

Bob Chamberlin, chair of the First Nations Wild Salmon Alliance, said his group was also pleased with the decision.

A juvenline sockeye salmon with sea lice. (Alexandra Morton)

“People have become aware, not only of the critical state of wild salmon in British Columbia, but what threat the fish farms operations, as they currently are, pose to wild salmon runs,” he said. 

The B.C. Salmon Farmers Association says the decision puts salmon farming in B.C. and across Canada at risk.

“This comes at a bad time, during a pandemic when local food supply and good local jobs have never been more important,” the group said in a statement. 

“We have just received this decision, and will be taking some time to consider it and speak with the numerous companies and communities involved in salmon farming in the province before commenting further.”

In September, 101 B.C. First Nations and their supporters called for the removal of the Discovery Islands salmon farms, asking they be moved to land-based closed-containment systems.

One week later, Department of Fisheries and Oceans scientists said the current farms were “minimal risk” to Fraser River salmon based on nine separate peer-reviewed risk assessments. Sea lice was not considered in the studies. 

Jordan said today’s decision does not mean fish farms elsewhere will necessarily face the same fate. 

“Discovery Islands is one area, it’s not an indicator of how everything is going to go,” she said. 

She said the 18-month period allows for the three million farm salmon in the pens to grow to harvestable size.

She expects 80 per cent of the fish will be gone by April 2021, in time for the start of the next Fraser River out-migration period.

The majority of the 19 Discovery Islands salmon farms are owned by three companies: Mowi Canada West, Cermaq Canada Ltd. and Grieg Seafoods Ltd. 

Currently, nine of the 19 farms are fallow with no fish in their pens.

Fraser River salmon returns are at a historic low this year with only 270,000 expected.

**********************************************************************

Posted October 15, 2020

It is important to keep the health of our salmon in the forefront of the politicians. Please see article written by Watershed Watch: https://watershedwatch.ca/

“We’ve compiled some questions you can ask BY EMAIL OR AT TOWN HALL MEETINGS:

Remember to be respectful and brief, but make sure they answer your questions. Bring your questions on paper in case you need to leave them with a candidate for follow-up. You may want to record the answers to your questions so you can hold your future representative to account!

Preamble: Introduce yourself briefly and say something about the importance of wild salmon and clean water to you and your family. State your concern about the massive declines we are seeing.

Some questions you can ask:

RESTORING HABITAT is critical to rebuilding struggling wild salmon runs and helping them adapt to climate change. Thousands of kilometres of salmon habitat are needlessly blocked by old culverts and obsolete flood control structures around B.C. If elected, will your government commit to significantly increasing salmon habitats by funding and implementing proven fish-friendly solutions for flood control and fish passage? And will you also commit to creating a long-term Watershed Security Fund to protect and restore our watersheds?

SALMON FARMS spread harmful viruses and parasites to young wild salmon and British Columbians want them gone. The province and First Nations are making historic progress by removing 17 salmon farms from the Broughton Archipelago but it’s business as usual everywhere else, including the Discovery Islands where farms were supposed to be removed this year. The federal government committed to working with the province to transition B.C. salmon farms to closed-containment facilities where they can’t harm wild salmon, but they’re dragging their heels and ignoring evidence of harm. These farms require provincial licenses to operate. If elected, would you immediately cancel the leases for salmon farms in the Discovery Islands and give notice to all the other salmon farms that their leases will terminate no later than the federal government’s transition date of 2025?

CLEAN, ABUNDANT WATER is the lifeblood of our province and good resource development should never degrade our watersheds—the source of our freshwater. B.C.’s new Water Sustainability Act isn’t being properly implemented and our watersheds are getting trashed. We need our provincial government to get tough on water wasters and polluters, with stronger rules and better enforcement. If elected, will you commit to fully implementing and enforcing the Water Sustainability Act and the Drinking Water Protection Act? And will you also commit to hiring an independent Chief Watershed Security Officer with the resources, powers, and staff to enforce the regulations that keep our rivers and salmon safe?

REBUILDING WILD SALMON runs has never been more important. Dozens of wild salmon populations across our province are endangered or threatened, including Fraser River steelhead. Most salmon species are federally managed, but steelhead are a provincial responsibility. The current provincial government supported the federal decision last year to not list two endangered Fraser steelhead populations under Canada’s Species at Risk Act. They also promised to introduce a B.C. species-at-risk law, which never materialized. If elected, will you support the rebuilding of B.C.’s endangered salmon runs under Canada’s Species at Risk Act and commit to creating a strong B.C. species-at-risk law to rebuild provincially managed species like wild steelhead?

FISHING is a cornerstone of B.C. life. It’s essential to First Nations and puts healthy, wild food on the tables of families across our province. B.C.’s provincial governments have a dark history of supporting fishing practices that contribute to the decline of wild salmon, and promoting artificial hatcheries rather than fixing the root causes. Large-scale hatchery production endangers the survival of wild salmon. We need our provincial government to embrace modern sustainable fishing practices that allow for the harvest of healthy, abundant wild salmon runs while leaving endangered stocks to recover. If elected, will you support a transition to modern selective fishing methods that reduce the catch of endangered fish, without relying on hatcheries? And will you support stronger enforcement and independent monitoring of salmon fisheries?

These suggested questions are based on the work we are doing at Watershed Watch. If you have other good questions to ask your candidates, go for it! Stay strong, be safe, and thank you for standing up for wild salmon.” – WATERSHEDWATCH.CA

January 23, 2020

Commercial salmon sector braces for another tough year on coast by Carla Wilson / Times Colonist

sockeye fisheryRichmond fishermen Roy Jantunen, left, and Doug Suto get their gear ready for the opening of the sockeye salmon fishery on the Fraser River in Richmond on Aug. 3, 2018.Photograph By RICHARD LAM, PNG

B.C. commercial salmon fishermen are waiting for pre-season forecasts due next month after 2019 delivered the lowest returns on record for prized Fraser River sockeye.

Last year also brought in sweeping fishing restrictions for Fraser River chinook because of fears for their survival and for the endangered southern resident killer whales, which depend on that species as their main source of food.

As well, in June, massive chunks of rock sheared off a cliff at Big Bar, crashed into the Fraser River and blocked spawning salmon. That led to a rescue operation to transport as many fish around the barricade as possible.

Federal Fisheries Minister Bernadette Jordan said last week that construction is starting soon to clear the river while water levels are low.

“This is a very difficult time for the resource and for those who depend and rely upon the resource,” Dane Chauvel, chairman of the B.C. Salmon Marketing Council, said Monday.

The council represents fishermen and related industries in the wild salmon sector.

“There’s not a lot to be optimistic about in the near-term,” said Chauvel.

This is not the time to despair, he said. “It’s the time to get together and figure this out and do what we can to recover.”

Chauvel is encouraged about the longer term, noting, for example, that Fisheries and Oceans is staging a meeting on Friday in Vancouver of all sectors working on the recovery of south-coast chinook.

Everyone is working collaboratively to come up with solutions, he said.

But between now and any recovery, there will be lean periods and there’s no reason to expect bumper runs in 2020, said Chauvel, who is a troller fisherman on the coast.

It’s too early to know for sure, but after last year, which Chauvel described as horrible, “everybody’s kind of hunkered down anticipating 2020 may be another year very much like the last.”

The near-term is going to be difficult for coastal communities depending on fisheries.

This needs to be explored with the fisheries minister, Chauvel said. “What are you going to do to support the fishermen, the communities and the infrastructure that depend upon the fisheries while we are working a recovery plan?”

If fisheries infrastructure disappears, it will be difficult to bring it and its related expertise back, Chauvel said.

“I think that’s the big issue right now.”

There were just 485,900 sockeye returning to the Fraser River year last year — down from the pre-season forecast of 4,795,900, said Fiona Martens, who is chief of fisheries management programs for the Pacific Salmon Commission.

That body is a joint Canada-U.S. organization charged with implementing the Pacific Salmon Treaty.

Last year’s Fraser River sockeye returns were the lowest since estimates began in 1893, she said. A preliminary forecast for this year’s Fraser River sockeye will be available in late February, Martens said.

As for other B.C. salmon runs, preliminary reports through Fisheries and Oceans Canada are not yet available.

Forecasts are normally finalized for the start of consultations for the integrated fisheries management plans, usually in early February, said a Fisheries and Oceans official.

On a more positive note, Fraser River pink salmon did better than expected, with a run size of 8,858,200 last season, beating the pre-season forecast of 5,018,600.

See full article here…….

Posted August 25, 2019

‘They’re flat broke’: Salmon fishermen demand disaster relief for failed season

Union president argues low salmon returns a climate change impact like forest fires, flood, tornadoes

CBC News by Roshini Nair·  Aug 21, 2019

Sockeye salmon in the Adams River near Shuswap Lake, north of Kamloops B.C., swim around 450 kilometres from the ocean via the Fraser and Thompson rivers to return to spawn where they were born. (Briar Stewart/CBC)

With some of this year’s salmon runs projected to be the lowest on record, West Coast salmon fishermen are demanding disaster relief from the federal and provincial governments.

The Pacific Salmon Commission is forecasting a total return of only 447,000 sockeye salmon to the Fraser, one of the world’s richest salmon rivers, this year.

“This is the lowest run size ever estimated since estimates began in 1893, and lower than the previous record for lowest run size of 858,000 observed in 2016,” its report read. 

Just nine years ago, in 2010, the forecasted return of sockeye salmon to the Fraser River was 34.5 million.

The United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union says those with salmon-only licences have been devastated.

Union president Joy Thorkelson says the season has been a total failure across all the major salmon-producing regions in the province: the Fraser, the Skeena, and the Central Coast.

“Mother Nature is very variable and some years stocks will come back in large numbers and other years they won’t. But this is the first year that I can remember — and I’ve been around for a long, long time now — where we’ve had a failure in every area of the B.C. coast.” 

‘Flat broke’

She says fishermen — especially those with salmon-only licences — are devastated. 

“They’re flat broke,” she said. 

“Many of them are in debt because they got the boat and gear ready for the season and they [invested] quite heavily in doing that. And then they put fuel in their boats and went to the fishing grounds and then caught nothing.”

On behalf of these fisherman, Thorkelson has put forward a letter asking the provincial and federal governments for climate change disaster assistance. 

“This is a climate change impact just the same as if you were in an area that was burned by forest fires or an area that was flooded out or hailed out or tornadoed out,” she said. 

Thorkelson said the fishermen are hoping for short-term relief, but acknowledges that a more long-term plan needs to be developed. 

“How are we going to have commercial fishermen and shoreworkers that can hang on to remaining in that industry? How can we have processors who are able to make it from one year to the next and be profitable?”

Government response

Jocelyn Lubczuk, the press secretary for Minister Jonathan Wilkinson of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, told CBC News that she “understands and empathizes with the economic impacts of the declining salmon returns across B.C.”

“Sadly today, many runs are in steep decline as direct result of a number of factors, including habitat destruction, harvest, and the effects of climate change,” she wrote. 

She added that while the DFO does not have the mandate to provide financial aid for Canadian workers, it will reach out to the proper department to discuss salmon fishermen on the West Coast. 

In response to CBC News, the B.C. Ministry of Agriculture said it has “strongly urged the Government of Canada to provide specific Employment Insurance enhancements aimed at assisting commercial fishermen and shoreworkers in B.C.’s fisheries-dependent communities.”

They noted the federal government has provided similar assistance in the Atlantic fisheries.

It also says the province is committed to conserving wild stocks so the industry can sustainably harvest salmon into the future.

See article here…..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s